Gonzaga finishes strong to defeat Loyola Marymount
For a while there, EDZ and I looked pretty smart being on the Loyolya Marymount hype-based bandwagon. The Lions played an outstanding first half of basketball as they really frustrated Gonzaga's shot selection, finished plays on the offensive end, and generally just outworked Mark Few's club. Tied at halftime, every Gonzaga fan had to be scratching their heads about what was happening to their team in the past few games. In the second half, however, the Zags opened up with a 14-5 lead and never looked back as they went on to defeat the Lions of LMU by a score of 85-69. The Bulldogs were sparked by their usual core of starters but received some great contributions from Grant Gibbs and the rest of the bench squad.
Loyola Marymount gave Gonzaga their best shot in the first half. Led by Vernon Teel who had 16 first half points, the Lions really subdued the typically raucous McCarthey Athletic Center. In that half, LMU shot 53% from the floor and came out with a very nice zone defense that really made the Bulldogs work for every shot, especially Elias Harris. Although he finished with another gorgeous statline (22 points on 8-12 shooting and 8 rebounds) I really though LMU did everything they could to try and stop him. They jumped passing lanes and generally caused havoc down low but they just don't have anyone that can match Elias' physical force and it showed this evening in Spokane. Harris was outstanding in every facet. He ran the court well and got a number of buckets in transition, made the pass when he had to, and is literally becoming unstoppable in the conference. I do believe that Matt Bouldin's biggest competition this year for conference player of the year is his German teammate.
Speaking of Bouldin, he had another nice offensive evening going 6-12 from the floor and ending up with 19 points. He made some big buckets when Gonzaga was on the ropes in the first half and provided a sense of calmness to this young team. He also added six boards and four assists to fill up the stat sheet for the Zags. I also thought that Steven Gray had another excellent game. I don't know what it has been recently but Steven seems to have added another level to his game. He's been extremely active and is showing more and more leadership as the year matures. He's obviously not the sharp shooter that we all thought he was two years ago but his game around the rim has improved so much that he really no longer needs to rely on the deep ball, unless it comes in rhythm. He had 18 points tonight as well as five boards and four assists. Demetri Goodson didn't see a whole lot of time or make a huge impact but I thought he played well when he was in there. LMU did a nice job of forcing Demetri to switch off Vernon Teel so he could get freed up but overall, I'll take any game where Meech has zero turnovers. The one place I think Gonzaga should utilize Meech more is when he is in the corner on offense. There isn't a defender that can stop him in the conference and I like that he can get to the rack and then kick it out to either Steven or Matt if there is no shot attempt.
I feel like my game recaps are becoming monotonous. It always starts with Elias and the progresses on to Matt and Steven. I guess that's a good thing, however, as those three have really established themselves as the "go-to" guys for the Bulldogs. Harris' front court mate Robert Sacre looked better tonight I thought. His defense was pretty sound in the paint as he ended up with three blocks. The zone defense really took him out of the early flow of the offense more than anyone. He was constantly fronted and the offense just never came through him. He only played 26 minutes but came down with eight rebounds which shouldn't be surprising considering LMU's overall lack of size. He still struggles on the offensive end dealing with that first contact and finishing strong but his post moves are obviously well developed if you compare them to when he arrived at Gonzaga.
The bench was my biggest positive tonight. In case you haven't noticed, I love what Mangisto Arop brings this team and I love what Grant Gibbs brought this team tonight. You might be a little perplexed by my Manny praise if you didn't watch the game but his six minutes really impressed me, as he has all year. He is constantly moving, crashing the boards, and generally working for his team. Grant showed the same the same tenacity tonight as well. You could almost see him think "there's no way I'm coming out of this game". He attacked the boards, had a few nice offensive rebounds for and-one attempts, and looked comfortable out there which has been a rarity since Davidson. I'm not going to sit here and write that Grant should start above Meech as this teams point guard but I think you saw some flashes tonight that warranted his hype coming out of Iowa. Don't forget that Grant was one of the highest rated point guards in 2008. He's got skill and I really enjoy what he brings as far as court vision goes. I'm very confident with him and Mangisto possibly roaming the back court in the future.
I mentioned earlier that these recaps, especially in the WCC, may get monotonous. With that being said, I've got to harp on the free throw shooting a bit more. Gonzaga missed 14 free throws tonight to shoot a whopping 63%. Rob Sacre and Elias Harris combined for seven misses. Kelly Olynyk and Grant Gibbs combined for five of their own off the bench. The point may be moot as there really hasn't been any improvement over the season but I would not be surprised if teams really start fouling guys like Elias Harris and Rob Sacre hard just to send them to the line. Might as well take your chances and send them to the line, especially in Harris' case. I don't know of a player in this conference, save for Dior Lowhorn, that can match his skill set and size combo.
Gonzaga is now the proud owner of an eight game win streak and will be traveling down to the Bay Area next week for road games against Santa Clara and San Francisco.
0 recs |
52 comments
|
Comments
Random thoughts
The one place I think we could utilize meech more is on the bench. Great showing by Gibbs tonight. Feel free to disagree with me all you want, but having a backcourt of Matt, Steven and Bol/Manny/Grant is much more effective for our team. Yes, Meech is faster than the most magical unicorn and could probably give Usain Bolt a run for his money. I still don’t think he’s as great of a defender as he is all hyped up to be, and he is a complete liability on offense. I feel like Gibbs is being given the Ira Brown treatment (though from a different standpoint). Let the kid play, good things will happen. Glad we found our defensive spirit the second half. Sacre looked like he wanted to start rebounding, too. Smart plays by KO, he’s gonna get better and better. Gray has been showing why he is my favorite Zag throughout the past few games. Yeah, he’s streaky, but when his confidence is high, he is the complete package. I can only pray that NBA scouts notice that Harris has weak 3pt defense and needs to work on his long range jump shot, so he will stay another year. And Matty B, damn he’s got skills. I really hope he gets a shot at the next level. Finally, I wish we were in a better conference, but I respect the heart LMU came out with tonight.
100% agree about Meech and have been saying as much for a while.
He has about as much use in the half court offense as Will does…and with the way Will has played of late…maybe less.
by SethGrandpa on Jan 24, 2010 12:54 AM PST up reply actions
more on meech
i thought meech did a good job in the second half of helping to set up the offense. Instead of rushing down court every time as we are used to seeing, he slowed up and allowed people to get set before making a controlled drive and dish either to matt or steven. Still he did not do this every time. however i thought overall his decisions with the ball in the second half were effective (zero turnovers). If he helps make plays like he did in the second half of yesterday’s game i’ll be pleased. Next game i hope he really focuses on smart defense none of this silly foul stuff.
I agree. I want Meech to find his niche.
But until he proves he can consistently it’s gonna be hard for me to stomach him in the lineup.
Agree on Gray
I called for him to be benched earlier in the year and I’m not eating my words with joy. He’s physical on D and playing with a lot of confidence on offense. I couldn’t be happier with what Steven has brought this team recently. I’m hesitant to go completely gaga over him at this point since his track record shows that he’ll have three straight sub-10 point games coming up so I’ll reserve judgment except to say that he is just playing great.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
Concern with Gray
Should we be concerned that he is just 4-19 from 3 pt range in conference? I love the way he scores at the basket, but has dropped off with his threes. Just wondering.
Obviously it'd be nice to see that improve
But I absolutely love what he is bringing right now.
I think it was SethGrandpa that said this recently but Steven has really changed from his freshman year. No longer a sharpshooter, he has blossomed into a complete scorer. You will sill get games where he goes 3-5 from deep but he’ll counter that with a game where he goes 0-3. As long as he doesn’t continue to force, I’ll be pleased. His intensity has picked up and he has impressed me so much recently that I’m willing to ignore the bad three point shooting.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
Thanks
I agree that his recent increase in intensity is great to see, I was just surprised in his three point production. I will be happy with the big three (Matt, Harris and Steven) continuing with balanced scoring, no matter how the pints come.
It truly is a good year to be a Zags fan.
I love everything Grant brings to the floor on offense.
He’s the team’s 2nd best passer (behind Matt), he rebounds, he hustles, he can shoot inside and outside, and he can handle. He’s basically Matt Bouldin lite. Yes, he occasionally falls asleep on D, but he’s not bad enough to be labeled a liability on that end. Bottom line…kid needs to play more.
Gibbie is da Bomb!
Other than Bouldin, Gibbie has to be the most fun to watch fun to watch. Very creative guy and you have to love his D.
What does it take to get these guys to work on their free throws. I swear we are going backwards. This will bite us some day.
mjc
mjc
What?!
No mention of Sacre running the break and the Bouldin slam?
gibbs= young bouldin
They are the exact same player physically, stylistically, and athletically. Get this kid on the court and he will develop into the second coming.
by giantkillerzags on Jan 24, 2010 8:24 AM PST reply actions
Matt/Grant/Kyle Dranginis
Thats the transition for the future. Meech and GJ are not team leaders and never will be. Nice kid’s, have a role but just not in the same boat with Matt, Grant and soon to be Kyle. A player on a team like Matt Bouldin, who probably will play in Europe or maybe get a chance at the NBA, My favorite in the past 20 years, is unique to College hoops. Why don’t you ask Coach Few about his value to this program for for years? GU has had better shooters, better athletes, tougher rebounders, better defenders but never n a package that ALWAYS puts team first and is by far the smartest player on the floor in every game.
Grant Gibbs, is going to have to get the opportunity after Matt leaves to move to running this team if they are to progress. This style of this team MUST have the “calmer”! The disher, the leader, the quietly motivating distributor of the game! Exit Matt enter Grant! Meech and GJ just aren’t going to be able to do that. They are different styles of players, needed, but different. Steven Gray doesn’t have the mental ability for the job but he does have all the skills. Now to the Kid in waiting!
Kyle Dranginis is every bit as smart as Matt. He’s a winner. It doesn’t matter to him how many “j’s” he hits or how his hair looks or if he gets the big flush! HE LEADS! If GU is going to continue it’s climb to the top, kids like Matt, Grant and Kyle will have to be recruited to keep the others in check and allow the “Stars” to shine at their best. Without them, Gu would be just another Mid Major.
I know it’s fun to watch the great moves, the high flying dunks, blocks into the stands, the 60mph drives to the hoop from one end to the other but don’t miss the Game! I hope next year you see all of the kids back at GU and Grant Gibbs calming, dishing, leading and “Quietly” being the motivating distributor of the games! JMO
by mikesequim on Jan 24, 2010 8:32 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I think it's funny how Few has taken to recruiting types of guards with startlingly similar skill sets.
I mean, when you read the recruiting reports on the guys, you notice how similar they are.
Pargo – Pargo V2 (Meech) – Pargo V3 (GJ)
Matt – Matt V2 (Grant) – Matt V3 (Kyle)
Exactly why I love Mangisto
He breaks the mold. He’s not a speedster but he’s extremely athletic and no one hits the boards like he does. He was sick yesterday and still had three boards and a couple assists. He also shown he can shoot the ball and penetrate as well.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
I'd disagree
I don’t see a whole lot of similarity between Pargo and our current two point guards, as well as between Grand and Matt. Pargo was a much stronger point guard that was also larger and a more complete offensive weapon. Pargo was primarily a scoring guard, whereas Meech is a defensive specialist with an incomplete offensive game.
Matt is one of the most well-rounded and exceptional guards in Gonzaga history. It’s way too soon to make comparisons between him and Grant, as we haven’t seen a whole lot of Grant this year. Grant does a lot of things well, but he’s not the complete player that Bouldin was even in his freshman year.
Zagnificent - GU Class of 2011
Really?
Pargo and Meech both can’t shoot and get all their points off of their great knack for penetrating in the lane, which is due to their speed. Both are reckless at times and you can see exactly when they’re going to drive it and not give it up. Sure Pargo is stronger (duh), but you’d have a hard time finding a guy who has a game more similar to Pargo’s than Meech.
Again, I’m not saying these are the “next” of certain players, I’m not saying they are on the same level, but it’s foolish to discount how amazingly similar the package of skills they bring to the game is. I’m talking player types here.
Where is all the Grant love coming from?
I admit the kid played a nice game against LMU, but he is not a good comparison to Matt Bouldin. As a true freshman, Matt was starting and averaging nearly 9 points per game. Grant is a redshirt freshman and is averaging just under 2.5 points per game. There is a reason that Grant has had a handful of DNP’s this year. Grant has a very nice basketball IQ, but he isn’t a reliable defense, and doesn’t have the combination of size/strength that Matt has, which allows for him to finish at the rim and in the paint. Grant will be a nice role player during his time at Gonzaga, and a guy that is certainly valuable to each team going forward, but I don’t think he is an All-WCC kind of guy. I do want to emphasize that not everyone can be an All-WCC type of guy, and the role player like Grant is vital to the success of the program.
Final 4 or bust
And you think?
Who is going to replace MB next year? What style will they play if it’s not Grant? For what reason do you think this? How many all WCC players are there that run teams?
They all have to be run by someone on their team! Just because you RUN a team doesn’t make you the “Dude”. The successful ones have the “Calmer” the rest just play how they can. The star’s move on and most of the time in hoops they are not the ones who run the team but are the beneficiaries of the Calmer! Your right about Matt and Grant but it appears to me, after the fact. HS is when you find them and either they got it or they don’t. You don’t teach what Matt, Grant and Kyle have………I give you Derek, PMAC, Jeremy and now, GJ and Meech….never were and never will be taught. It’s not that they were bad players, it’s simply between the 6" from ear to ear, thats all. All those kids could hoop but none of them have what Matt Grant or Kyle have, IMO. Some of them were better shooters, defenders, quicker and faster but not as court smart! That is why you must have those players in your arsenal to win. Oh well, hoops 201!
Go watch Kyle play, you will all really enjoy it.
What makes you believe Grant is the guy though
Clearly the staff doesn’t think so, or else he would play more than 6 minutes per game. Grant has shown no ability, even at the high school level, to be a takeover guy like Dickau, Stepp, Bouldin, Pargo, or even potentially Harris. Who do I think it will be: Harris next year. He has arguably the best skill set that this program has seen, and you can literally watch his basketball IQ improve every game.
Grant has a knack for being around the ball, but he has shown nothing, and I mean nothing to believe he can Run a top 10 program. Besides your gut feeling, tell me why I should think that Grant can RUN a team?
Final 4 or bust
Why not Harris?
All this time I thought i understood.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
Is that really your response?
At least some people get it? Guess what Mike…just because you believe something different then me, doesn’t make you right. I asked why you believe Grant can run a team, and you didn’t respond to my question. A PG doesn’t necessarily have to run a team, and I think this year is a great example. While everyone crucifies Meech, not one wants to point out that the kid is 16-3 as a starter and has this team in the Top 8. Mike, are you implying that we are 16-3 in spite of Meech? If Grant was better, why doesn’t he start over Meech?
I argue that this year, and for sure next year, the offense will run through Harris. Who got the ball with the game on the line against Illinois….I believe it was Elias. Who carried this team to a victory over St. Mary’s….some guy named Elias.
Final 4 or bust
I agree..
Harris has remarkable leadership for only being a frosh. He has soooo much of a competitive edge that he will do his best to make sure everyone is playing their hardest. I think you just look at him and the intensity that he brings and it makes you want to bring it too. He has great knowledge of the game and how to win and I think his teammates will look to him for guidance next year when Bouldin is gone.
I also think Grant has some of the calm leadership that Bouldin embodies, but by not starting this year, he won’t quite have the same effectiveness or knowledge that Harris will be able to provide.
the true point guard theory is over hyped
The greatest NBA coach to ever live (Phil Jackson) has never had a true point guard. Yes the college game is different and more of an emphasis is put on guard play, but I have seen plenty of college programs get to the final 4 without an incredible offensive PG! Mike this is the best we have at this position right now! You put guys like Matt, or Gibbs running the point and you will immediatley see 3/4 court traps and the likes and you will see why we can’t handle extreme athletic pressure. Meech is doing just fine! If Grant is going to chew up more playing time it should probably be over Bol? But to me the more glaring issue over the weekend was the horrible officiating and the dissapearance of Rob. Has anybody seen him?
glen mccloud
I feel like all this is jumping the gun
Meech is a sophomore and GJ is a frosh and already you’ve written them off as being able to lead this team.
Also, please don’t compare Jeremy and Derek with the biggest bust in Gonzaga history (PMAC). I have enormous amounts of respect for Jeremy and Derek’s work here and just because they weren’t your prototype, doesn’t mean they weren’t great guards in this lineage.
I still think Manny is a better replacement for Matt and would like to see Bol first off the bench next season or vice versa. I want to win a title and I feel like these guys have all the tools to do it. Haven’t seen as much from Grant…yet but I hope to.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
I'm with you
Manny. Bol, Kelly, GJ – all freshman – who knows what they bring to the “leadership table” yet?
At this point though I would look to see Elias to continue to step up and lead this team next year.
I couldn’t disagree with you more about Raivio. I can’t speak for guard play before the mid-90s but he’s one of my favorites since then. And every time I see a missed FT, I miss him a little bit more.
I really like Meech (aside from his game against St. Mary’s), and haven’t seen enough of GJ to comment on what I think of him, although I liked what I saw in Seattle.
by allrachel on Jan 24, 2010 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think people are saying he's the "next Matt Bouldin." But they have the EXACT same skillsets.
Both are bigger PGs who can shoot the 3 and have touch around the basket. Both have an amazing passing touch. Both aren’t stellar athletes and at times struggle on D (remember Matt was a defensive liability at times his first few years). Both are very deliberate with their style of play.
As for the discrepancy in playing time, remember the roster construction Matt’s freshman year as opposed to Grant’s. The guards when Matt showed up were Ravio, Pargo, and P-Mac…that’s it. He was the third best guard the minute he stepped on campus. As for Grant he comes in this year with Matt, Gray, and Meech already in place, plus GJ and Manny coming along too. There wasn’t a gaping hole in the starting lineup for him to fill.
I think, as I’ve said, that Grant is Matt Bouldin lite. I don’t think he’ll ever reach Matt’s level, but he can fill his role stylistically.
Just to clarify
Does Grant being a 30% shooter from behind the arc make him a good three-point shooter. I feel like everyone is assuming Grant is the same type of player as Matt, without ever actually seeing Grant play enough to support this opinion. Lets not assume that because he is the same height and skin color, that he is the same player
Final 4 or bust
It comes down to court vision, the cliché basketball IQ
Meech recklessly runs into the lane and either kicks it out to Matt or Steven, gets into trouble or gets a lucky bounce. Grant seems to understand how to make the team flow better and has an ability to make some amazing assists. He is not Matt Bouldin or Dan Dickau or any of the other great GU PGs…yet. He has not been needed yet in his young career but I am confident that the transition will not be a difficult one and that with experience he will become the go-to guy. Here is a hypothesis for you, EDZ (or anyone else who wants to chime in), if Matt were to find out that his wrist is broken and he can’t play any more conference games and Steven decided to leave basketball to pursue his acting career would you rather run the offense right now through Grant, Meech or GJ? FTR I like Manny and Bol and I think they will fill up the stat sheet but I don’t see them running the team and therefore don’t include them on the list.
Again, as I said, I'm basing this partially on the player he was before getting to GU.
The scouting report on him out of high school was basically the same as Matt’s (though Matt was clearly the higher prospect). The things you have seen Grant do on the floor are similar.
And please, it doesn’t have to do with race. Kevin Love’s best comparison is Wes Unseld. There are certain distinct player types, and really I’m astonished how so many people don’t get that.
Close but not exact
I would not say that Grant has the exact same skillsets as Matt. They are similar in some ways but very different in other ways. One big similarity that i see is the court vision. Matt is one of the best passers i have had the pleasure of watching. One of the main reasons for this is his unbelievable court vision. From what i have seen, Grant has a similar court vision but not at the same level as Matt. Hopefully he can develop that more over the next few years.
Another similarity that i see between the two players is their 3 point shooting. As EDZ said, Grant is shooting about 30% from behind the arc. This isn’t a great percentage, but if i remember right, Matt shot a similar 3 point percentage his freshmen year. He was never lights out but hit his fair share. Over his 4 years here, Matt has improved his 3 point shooting every year and i expect to see the same from Grant. He has a silky smooth shot and as he gets more comfortable and confident with his game, the percentage will improve.
There is one thing that i see between Matt and Grant that really sets them apart though and that is the ability to drive to the hoop in traffic and finish. Matt has an incredible ability to overpower defenders and get to the hole. He has shown this ability since the first day he wore a Gonzaga uniform. It is one big reason why he is the dominant player that he is. It is a scoring threat that defensive teams have to constantly think about. This skill is something that i have yet to see in Grant. Without that skill, Grant is a very different player. It effects how he scores and it also will effect the way the offense runs.
Overall, they are similar players but far from exact matches.
by D-Cheney on Jan 24, 2010 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
nice win
Nice win yesterday. I guess they could have won by closer to 25 points, but that gets to be boring. Elias is really good. What happened to Sacre’s offense? He was good against Michigan State and in Maui, but seems to have disappeared recently.
Josh Normand
You know
before the season started most of our expectations of Rob were about 6-8 pts and about 8 rebounds with some solid defense. Michigan State and Maui were a huge surprise and fun to watch but what we’re seeing now (while disappointing after his great start) is just what we expected from Rob.
rebounds.
Rob isn’t close to the 8 rebounds. His offensive production is expected, but his defensive production and his rebounding has got to improve!
glen mccloud
Great 2nd half
The crowd was getting fairly antsy closing in on halftime and we were scratching our heads wondering HOW Portland held Loyola to 39 the whole game and here we are tied at the half 42-42!
Would have loved to hear the azz chewing in the locker room from Few…LOL
Nice second half though, defensive intensity picked up considerably. But, the free throws had the crowd groaning!
**Mangisto Arop was on the court one hour after the game, after almost everyone had left practicing all by himself. Hmmmm…wonder if something is up?
Great win though…As my departed Dad always said, “at the end of the year, its not how, its how many.” RIP
Its gonna be gLoRiOUS!!~
Ya, something is up
Mangisto Arop was on the court one hour after the game, after almost everyone had left practicing all by himself. Hmmmm…wonder if something is up?
He’s competing. Great to hear that.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
I guess this is why our bench is so exciting
One game we fall in love with Grant as the next Matt Bouldin and then there are games when Manny, Bol, and Kelly shine.
I still prefer Bol, Kelly, and Manny off the bench in that order but it was nice to see Grant get some good minutes. It’s obvious that Few is going to roll with the hot hand and, last night, it was Grant.
I’m not ready to canonize him as the next great guard until he shows me he can make an outside shot or consistent free throws but all in all, it was more than I expected from him.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
I agree with those guys coming in before Gibbs (although I would bring Manny in before Bol), I just think Gibbs should get some more chances like he was getting at the beginning of the year (doesn’t mean significant minutes). He still has a lot to prove, but he’s a smart player. Definitely needs to show he can shoot outside though.
You guys have white guy bias
Lets let Grant Gibbs actually do something first before we start kissing his ass… Every bench player we have is pretty much dispensable and replaceable, our bench just kills us and our fatigue is a reason we blow so many leads all the time…..
have you watched any of the games?
fatigue is not an issue and our bench has been very strong for a bunch of underclassmen.
by trufflshuffl on Jan 25, 2010 8:02 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly.....
Our bench players have been outstanding all year. It may not be every game, but they have been consistent. Manny, Bol, Kelly and now Grant have all shined in certain games and helped GU win some games. 1AndDone- what basketball team are you watching??
8 points and 6 boards in 17 min
Last time I checked that counted as “something”. I see very little “ass kissing” going on, just people taking notice that Gibbs played a solid game.
Bol Kong
I’m getting a bit disappointed with his play, and it’s not because he is not scoring and hitting his set 3’s. Bol hasn’t shown a desire to become anything more than a set shooting threat, and is being treated as such by defenses. I can count the number of times Bol has tried to drive the lane on one hand. With his athletic ability and length, he really should be asserting himself more on offense than he is currently. He has become a good defender and rebounder, but until he shows me that he can be a versatile offfensive threat, I’d prefer Manny be first off the bench.
Zagnificent - GU Class of 2011
Bol has a great shot
but really needs to put more time into becoming a better dribbler. He has great size, he looks like a superstar, but needs to make a lot of improvements…
In regards to Bol
I wonder if Few is starting to tell him how important he is to this team. I agree with Zagnificent that he’s really got to assert himself a tad more because we really need another consistent scorer. Especially if he’s going to keep getting the most minutes off the bench. We’ve heard from previous coaches that he can be a scorer in a variety of ways and he flashed some of that early but recently he has been a bit more passive. I’m sure he’s still just a bit tentative at this point but I feel like we’re deep enough in the season that the young guys should be feeling confident in the system.
The Slipper Still Fits - SB Nation's home for the Gonzaga Bulldogs!
I agree with Andy! But not with you Mike!
Matt’s the man!, but Mike you have got to chill on Meech. we tend to forget he locks down other players, camplell, o’connel, and BJ were introduced to Meech and his stellar D! Gibbs is a nice player, and I too would like to see a little more PT for Gibbs, but do you really think Grant and Matt can handle a full court press from say, Louisville, Memphis, Kentucky, Florida? Meech is just fine, and I actually think his shot will come around. It is a soft shot with good rotation, he is just lacking confidence right now. I have actually seen Meech do a better job in the last few games at penetrating and kicking. He will find his rythm, remember he is 19 years old! You claim you coach or have coached, then you of all people should understand developement!
glen mccloud
Elias Harris
Is Elias Harris a NBA prospect you have to look out for?
Greetings from Germany, guys!
by StripclubPapst on Jan 26, 2010 10:39 AM PST reply actions

by 

















